tatty bojangles (
apocalypsos) wrote2009-09-01 07:24 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm sorry. We can't help you. You're clearly too stupid to live.
Okay, so this my new favorite thing, brought to us by
ogi_ogas of SurveyFail here:
Well, slash is kind of the female equivalent of the straight male interest in transsexuals.
What is this, I don't even.
Oh, and I get a bullshit answer from him before anybody else in that thread got their bullshit answers from him. Do I win a prize?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Well, slash is kind of the female equivalent of the straight male interest in transsexuals.
What is this, I don't even.
Oh, and I get a bullshit answer from him before anybody else in that thread got their bullshit answers from him. Do I win a prize?
no subject
no subject
It should be a GOOD prize.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ugh. i really, really hope that bu's irb takes this seriously and can come up with the necessary excuse to squash them like the bugs they are.
no subject
how about this one?
I AM NOBODY'S PORNING MONKEY. >:(
Re: how about this one?
no subject
no subject
And then I scrolled down that one critical notch. My desk now has a forehead-sized dent in it. -_-
I give up. I'm going back to my porn, and I don't give a tinker's toot WHY I like it. So there.
no subject
no subject
no subject
God, this asshole is sure blinded to his own privilege, huh? And to, like, science, and the scientific method, and to basic common fucking sense.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
No one tells me anything. I'm always behind the curve on these things.
no subject
The idea is definitely bouncing around that the experiment was really about pissing a group off online, not about what they claimed. Which is also an ethical violation, but apparently more in line with one researcher's prior work.