![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Regarding the shootings at Virginia Tech, after the respectful prayers for the victim's families:
"The president believes that there is a right for people to bear arms, but that all laws must be followed," spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
THIS is what you're going to include in a public statement only hours after the worst mass shooting in U.S. history?!
*curses a LOT*
"The president believes that there is a right for people to bear arms, but that all laws must be followed," spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
THIS is what you're going to include in a public statement only hours after the worst mass shooting in U.S. history?!
*curses a LOT*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:25 pm (UTC)Because he needs it.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)As it is, I smell flames in the direction of the White House. Whoever authorised THAT statement's going to be the first one on the bonfire.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)I am a firearm owner, and all of my arms are completely legal, granted on the street faced with a common gang member, my firearms would be useless because the criminals have illegal military grade weapons smuggled in from out of country, and I am stuck with legal civilian grade. But I had *I* been on that campus and armed, this nutbag would have only gotten one person before I dropped him.
The actions of common criminals should not have any bearing on law abiding citizens right. Even in Europe people can own firearms for hunting and such, but they actually protect their borders and keep the black market guns from getting into their countries, this is why they have low death rates from firearms, America is completely open and largely unregulated at it's borders. Even if guns are completely outlawed, the criminals will still get them due to lack of border security and only law abiding citizens would suffer.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)*foaming with vitriol and sarcasm*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)(Grar.)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:36 pm (UTC)I feel the pain. (I have no direct connection with Virginia Tech beyond being a longtime Virginia resident, but I'm doing my best to feel for them. It's horrible that this happened.)
Sorry you encountered the dicksmacks when you lived in Northern Virginia. I managed mostly to avoid them while I lived there (from fifth through 12th grade). I was lucky in that way.
Excuse me, I'm going to go off to fume...
(no subject)
From:This is not intended as a flame.
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:59 pm (UTC)Except ones that are inconvenient to the current nonwar effort, that is.
Heh.
Yeah, all around bad. I mean, the reporter has to ask the question because they always have to ask these questions (like the SNL skits where the reporters ask in every imaginable way exactly where the troops are stationed and at what time of day they are least able to respond to threat. heh), but yes, today's response is, hey, maybe now isn't the time to talk about that.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 08:11 pm (UTC)"In actuality, the second amendment has been well extended beyond its words, and..."
or maybe
"Way-ul, we needs our guns, so from now one, everybody will have to consent to a stripsearch before being allowed out of their houses, to prove that they have no concealed weapons...."
or possibly
"This sucks. But I'm not running next term anyway, so who cares what I say?"
I mean, honestly, trying to pander to all sides of the issue is exactly what I would expect, so I'm not really disappointed.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:30 pm (UTC)What an asshat.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 11:06 pm (UTC)Stupid question, I know, but sheesh.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 11:21 pm (UTC)Is there a "total-fucking-moron" clause in the legalese for impeaching a president? Cuz this should set it off.
*whacks Idiot-In-Chief with clue by four*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-17 12:31 am (UTC)