![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Regarding the shootings at Virginia Tech, after the respectful prayers for the victim's families:
"The president believes that there is a right for people to bear arms, but that all laws must be followed," spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
THIS is what you're going to include in a public statement only hours after the worst mass shooting in U.S. history?!
*curses a LOT*
"The president believes that there is a right for people to bear arms, but that all laws must be followed," spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
THIS is what you're going to include in a public statement only hours after the worst mass shooting in U.S. history?!
*curses a LOT*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:23 pm (UTC)Man, if there's one reason I'm glad I'm out of Virginia, that's it. (Away from the backwards dicksmacks I hated and home to the backwards dicksmacks I'm used to. *sigh*)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:25 pm (UTC)Because he needs it.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)As it is, I smell flames in the direction of the White House. Whoever authorised THAT statement's going to be the first one on the bonfire.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:40 pm (UTC)As a gunowner, I fully support gun control legislation. And now the Administration has opened the way for THAT to be part of the national discourse in speaking of this event - not just by liberals, either. Now it'll be national, and I have the feeling that'll call for a response.
Badly played, Dana Perino - but thank you for bringing it up!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-17 02:33 am (UTC)Dunno about Faux News, don't watch them. (Saw CNN only in passing, I just can't drown myself in this tragedy, can't handle that anymore since 9/11 and Katrina so I've been watching PotC: Dead Man's Chest instead. :))
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)I am a firearm owner, and all of my arms are completely legal, granted on the street faced with a common gang member, my firearms would be useless because the criminals have illegal military grade weapons smuggled in from out of country, and I am stuck with legal civilian grade. But I had *I* been on that campus and armed, this nutbag would have only gotten one person before I dropped him.
The actions of common criminals should not have any bearing on law abiding citizens right. Even in Europe people can own firearms for hunting and such, but they actually protect their borders and keep the black market guns from getting into their countries, this is why they have low death rates from firearms, America is completely open and largely unregulated at it's borders. Even if guns are completely outlawed, the criminals will still get them due to lack of border security and only law abiding citizens would suffer.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:37 pm (UTC)Personally, my father's side of the family is filled with hunters, so I have no problem with law-abiding citizens owning guns. The gunman's weapons were probably illegal, but then again if they weren't I wouldn't be surprised either.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:41 pm (UTC)Technically the second ammendment was put in place to keep the goverment in check, the forefathers figured with a well regulated militia if the goverment tried to gain complete power and stopped working for the people, the people would be able to take it back. Lot of good that did, we are now exactly everything they fought against.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:44 pm (UTC)If I had any money I'd probably buy one myself. I really want to learn how to handle one, at least, if only so that I can write guns better in my fiction.
Lot of good that did, we are now exactly everything they fought against.
Ain't that the truth. *grumbles*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)*foaming with vitriol and sarcasm*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:33 pm (UTC)(Grar.)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:36 pm (UTC)I feel the pain. (I have no direct connection with Virginia Tech beyond being a longtime Virginia resident, but I'm doing my best to feel for them. It's horrible that this happened.)
Sorry you encountered the dicksmacks when you lived in Northern Virginia. I managed mostly to avoid them while I lived there (from fifth through 12th grade). I was lucky in that way.
Excuse me, I'm going to go off to fume...
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:40 pm (UTC)1.) A reporter actually thought NOW, when we still don't have a clear picture of the events, was a great time to ask about gun control.
2.) The White House spokesman didn't bitchslap him and say, "You think you can wait until we know what's going on before you bring this stuff up, dingbat?"
Not that I'm surprised by either event, but still.
This is not intended as a flame.
Date: 2007-04-16 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:46 pm (UTC)In summation:
Bush = idiot.
But then, like I said, we knew that.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 07:59 pm (UTC)Except ones that are inconvenient to the current nonwar effort, that is.
Heh.
Yeah, all around bad. I mean, the reporter has to ask the question because they always have to ask these questions (like the SNL skits where the reporters ask in every imaginable way exactly where the troops are stationed and at what time of day they are least able to respond to threat. heh), but yes, today's response is, hey, maybe now isn't the time to talk about that.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 08:11 pm (UTC)"In actuality, the second amendment has been well extended beyond its words, and..."
or maybe
"Way-ul, we needs our guns, so from now one, everybody will have to consent to a stripsearch before being allowed out of their houses, to prove that they have no concealed weapons...."
or possibly
"This sucks. But I'm not running next term anyway, so who cares what I say?"
I mean, honestly, trying to pander to all sides of the issue is exactly what I would expect, so I'm not really disappointed.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 08:16 pm (UTC)It's just tasteless to start in on it hours after the crime when we don't even have a confirmed final death toll, the gunman's identity, or really anything substantial ... just the bare bones of what's happened.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:30 pm (UTC)What an asshat.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 11:06 pm (UTC)Stupid question, I know, but sheesh.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-16 11:21 pm (UTC)Is there a "total-fucking-moron" clause in the legalese for impeaching a president? Cuz this should set it off.
*whacks Idiot-In-Chief with clue by four*
no subject
Date: 2007-04-17 12:31 am (UTC)