![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Per FW, Stephenie Meyer has posted Breaking Dawn FAQs to her website.
Now, on to the "how is this possible?" question. First of all, of course it's not possible. None of this story is possible. It's a fantasy story about creatures that don't actually exist. Within the context of the fantasy, however, this is how it works...
WORLDBUILDING FAIL.
GAH. *growls*
Now, on to the "how is this possible?" question. First of all, of course it's not possible. None of this story is possible. It's a fantasy story about creatures that don't actually exist. Within the context of the fantasy, however, this is how it works...
WORLDBUILDING FAIL.
GAH. *growls*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:07 am (UTC)But it's just a FANTASY book, so it's okay, right?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:21 am (UTC)Well, I couldn't call her Jennifer or Ashley. What do you name the most unique baby in the world?
Yeah, that's right. We Jennifers are boring as fuck, yo.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:29 am (UTC)Yes, of course.
This explains why the child is named Sarek. Or Yoda. Or F'nrglknf!th'oo.
Also? Yes, I notice Jo really struggled with the problem of her superunique special hero and his common name. The series totally woudl have worked a lot better if his name had been Soporific Vagina. *nods*
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:30 am (UTC)What do you name the most unique baby in the world?
Mary Sue, of course.
(PS. I think you've hooked me onto that German soap opera. Judith is pretty awesome.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:38 am (UTC)HEE! Awesome. I keep meaning to put a link to the playlist in my favorites because every time I use one of the icons where Christian and Olli are kissing in a comm, somebody goes, "Oh, who are those two hotties?" Oh, allow me to show you ... ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:46 am (UTC)http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/aug/31/leaked.book
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:48 am (UTC)Oh, Twilight fandom. Shine on, you completely fucking batshit pile of diamonds.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 08:01 am (UTC)And if she knows who leaked the damn thing, why hasn't a team of Little,Brown lawyers gone after this person? They made us sign a stupid waiver saying that we wouldn't so much as open the boxes before the release date. So... why no public crucifixion for the person who has effectively dried up their cash cow?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:30 pm (UTC)I officially give up on my Sam/Edward movement.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 12:58 pm (UTC)You kidding me? Harry Potter managed it all these years. And they've only JUST started to split the mvies into two. And I think thats for just the final book/movie.
Now, I haven't read BD but...aren't the HP books longer than the Twilight ones? (keep in mind, it's also been awhile since I've read any of the HP books) Aaaand I'm pretty sure that they've definitely got way more plot points that should have been covered but weren't.
Get over yourself, smeyer.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 04:44 pm (UTC)Not only that, but nothing happens for about the first 540 pages, and even after that it's hard to say that anything too complicated plot-wise happens. A film version can easily cover the whole book in two hours.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:06 pm (UTC)Idk.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:53 pm (UTC)You know who she reminds me of? Sandra Lee, of Semi-Homeade fame. It's the same principle of acting like they know what they're doing while having no idea. And, sure, you can sell books like that. But it would be so much better if they had even half a clue.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:58 pm (UTC)I loved the overall flow of the FAQ too. "As I JUST SAID above, blah blah blah" Like dude, you're the one writing it! We just got here! Why snap at us for asking the theoretical question you wrote in?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:03 pm (UTC)Though a fav. runner-up is her Clintonesque "It depends on what your definition of 'werewolf' is."
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:17 pm (UTC)I kind of want to her to get cornered in a room by Nora Roberts and Diane Duane. Diane could be the good cop, and Nora could just smack her upside the head repeatedly.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:57 pm (UTC)I read her books, promptly thought 'I can build a better system of vampirism than that' and have just started writing. Because I said so is not an adequate world building device.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 04:07 pm (UTC)I mean, sparkly greased-up vampires. That will never cease to be funny. Ever.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:40 pm (UTC)LEARN, you vacuous twit.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:53 pm (UTC)Right?
How does one magically acquire chromosomes anyway?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:42 pm (UTC)Does your mental image of SMeyer look like mine anymore, with the back of one hand permanently attached to her forehead so she can more easily swoon?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:50 pm (UTC)"Uh-oh, Mommy's got the wig on, we can't bother her..."