More election stuff
Oct. 22nd, 2008 04:59 pmI get cautiously optimistic every time I go over to electoral projection sites like FiveThirtyEight.com, Electoral Vote.com, and Election Projection and see that most of them are projecting about 350 electoral votes to Obama and about 180 to McCain, depending on the site. And then I pull myself back by thinking of that photo of Truman holding the "Dewey Defeats Truman" paper. It ain't over 'til it's over, you know?
Then again, hearing things from conservatives in the media like that I'm not a "real American" because I'm voting for Obama -- regardless of the real American vagina I came out of, the real America I've lived in since exiting said vagina, and the real America I've paid taxes to since I got my first job after the sixteenth anniversary of exiting said vagina -- makes me worry.
I think that if I'm not a real American, I must be an imaginary American, and therefore my life doesn't include nearly enough wizards and dragons. Hmph.
Then again, hearing things from conservatives in the media like that I'm not a "real American" because I'm voting for Obama -- regardless of the real American vagina I came out of, the real America I've lived in since exiting said vagina, and the real America I've paid taxes to since I got my first job after the sixteenth anniversary of exiting said vagina -- makes me worry.
I think that if I'm not a real American, I must be an imaginary American, and therefore my life doesn't include nearly enough wizards and dragons. Hmph.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:02 pm (UTC)Hahahahaha!
OMG that's priceless... I think I must have a pin or something with that statement on it...
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:08 pm (UTC)*facepalm* I tell you. The stupid, it BURNS.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:18 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure it was Rachel Maddow.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 09:56 pm (UTC)I read a little about Dewey Defeats Truman, and the reason the paper screwed up was because the polls in those days were conducted by phones, but only certain demographics could afford phones then, which skewed the results. There's been talk of cell phones throwing off polls in '08, but I figure the last two elections have spooked the media out of boldly proclaiming a victor. And I don't think cell users are gonna come out in force for McCain.
To me, it looks more like the '96 election, where Clinton spanked Dole pretty hard. He was up by 9% or so in the polls, and Dole could only muster a little over 150 electoral votes, and the whole thing was over by 10pm. It might be closer this time, but that's how I see this playing out.
I guess McCain could mount some glorious comeback, but if he was gonna rally, wouldn't he have done it by now? Also, if the whole "We don't know who this young guy is" stuff didn't work for Hillary Clinton six months ago, I don't see how it'll help McCain now that Obama's become even more visible to the public than he was in 2007.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 11:42 pm (UTC)http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081022/ap_on_el_pr/ap_poll_presidential_race
no subject
Date: 2008-10-23 01:15 am (UTC)