I've been starting a post on lovable douchebags and why I love them in my fiction, and fandom and sexism and fic taboos and whatnot, and every time I start it, I delete the bulk of it and feel the urge to go bang my head off the wall, because it quickly degenerates into why I kinda want to throw pies at half of fandom.
The content seems to boil down to:
1. Just because I (and other people) adore lovable douchebags doesn't mean we approve of every little thing they do.
2. Just because I (and other people) adore a ship in which a lovable douchebag hooks up with ... well, anyone, doesn't actually mean we support abusive relationships or marriages we know will self-destruct in a few years or whatever. (See: Chuck/Blair -- I fully expect those two to marry and divorce a couple of times with lots of angry sex in between and a couple of eyerolling kids who keep catching them both in compromising positions when they're supposed to be, like, signing divorce papers or whatever. 'Cause I like trainwrecks. :D)
3. Just because I (and other people) adore a male lovable douchebag doesn't mean we'd hate him as a woman, or vice versa. (Actually, there are some really fabulous female lovable douchebags out there: Faith, Sarah Connor, Starbuck, George Lass, Deb Morgan, etc.)
4. Just because I (and other people) adore a lovable douchebag doesn't mean we would want to have anything to do with him in real life. (I think Dean is hot as fuck. However, if he approached me in a bar, I probably couldn't make a run for it fast enough. He's a smug criminal transient, no matter how good he looks in those jeans.)
5. You might actually adore a lovable douchebag and not even know it. They're sneaky like that. (Jack Harkness is a lovable douchebag. Depending on the season, Buffy Summers and Veronica Mars are both lovable douchebags. Arrested Development is entirely peopled by lovable douchebags.)
I feel like writing a definition of a lovable douchebag, where your character would have to fit four basic rules:
-- They're a hero, at least technically.
-- You love them in fiction.
-- But in real life, you would haaaaaate them and not want anything to do with them.
-- They really wouldn't be bothered by that for the most part.
Is it sad that I'm establishing a claim on asshats we love to hate? Heh.
The content seems to boil down to:
1. Just because I (and other people) adore lovable douchebags doesn't mean we approve of every little thing they do.
2. Just because I (and other people) adore a ship in which a lovable douchebag hooks up with ... well, anyone, doesn't actually mean we support abusive relationships or marriages we know will self-destruct in a few years or whatever. (See: Chuck/Blair -- I fully expect those two to marry and divorce a couple of times with lots of angry sex in between and a couple of eyerolling kids who keep catching them both in compromising positions when they're supposed to be, like, signing divorce papers or whatever. 'Cause I like trainwrecks. :D)
3. Just because I (and other people) adore a male lovable douchebag doesn't mean we'd hate him as a woman, or vice versa. (Actually, there are some really fabulous female lovable douchebags out there: Faith, Sarah Connor, Starbuck, George Lass, Deb Morgan, etc.)
4. Just because I (and other people) adore a lovable douchebag doesn't mean we would want to have anything to do with him in real life. (I think Dean is hot as fuck. However, if he approached me in a bar, I probably couldn't make a run for it fast enough. He's a smug criminal transient, no matter how good he looks in those jeans.)
5. You might actually adore a lovable douchebag and not even know it. They're sneaky like that. (Jack Harkness is a lovable douchebag. Depending on the season, Buffy Summers and Veronica Mars are both lovable douchebags. Arrested Development is entirely peopled by lovable douchebags.)
I feel like writing a definition of a lovable douchebag, where your character would have to fit four basic rules:
-- They're a hero, at least technically.
-- You love them in fiction.
-- But in real life, you would haaaaaate them and not want anything to do with them.
-- They really wouldn't be bothered by that for the most part.
Is it sad that I'm establishing a claim on asshats we love to hate? Heh.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 03:45 pm (UTC)I love Dean to death and it's disheartening to see people bash me and call me a misogynist because I like him - but the caveat there is exactly like you said, if I was ever approached by Dean in real life, you better believe I'm going to be running for the hills.
Why is that so hard for some people to get? Some of us understand the boundaries of fiction and reality.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 03:53 pm (UTC)Dean's sexist and that's okay. The problem comes when the WRITERS are churning out sexist bullshit. You can write strong female characters, not kill them off or torture them, and still allow Dean that slice of everyday sexism.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 04:22 pm (UTC)Heh. I'd probably stick around just long enough to tap that, but yeah. No long-term commitment possible unless some serious changes happen, and I know better than to think any woman could change him by being in a relationship with him.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 05:26 pm (UTC)If they wanted to have a lovable douchebag, they should have written a new one, because as it stands, Dick Casablancas was already too much of an asshole to be in any way lovable.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-14 12:10 am (UTC)