Date: 2004-09-26 11:57 am (UTC)
Was it 'fong'? I always thought he was saying 'thong'.

Which could of course be interpreted in all sorts of NEW fun ways, but I just assumed he meant 'thong' as in 'leather whip of some sort'. (Which in itself has enough sexual connotations to keep me happy.)

Also, that movie was so slashy that I half-expected a scene with Wat, Chaucer, and cheesy porn music. Chaucer was naked enough.

I may have read too much into Wat's stammering to a naked Chaucer about how long and hard he would be fonged, too. But I blame that on the movie, since, y'know, the only way to MISS the sexual subtext in that scene would be to put your hands over your eyes, spin around in circles, and sing "THE WHEELS ON THE BUS GO ROUND AND ROUND" really loudly and offkey to drown it out entirely. And even that's not a guarantee.

The plotline was stupid, and Jocelyn was evidently taking her fashion tips from Queen Amidala, and Will spent most of his movie thinking with the wrong head(not to mention holding a giant freaking wooden piece of compensation and driving it into every man in sight, so I really don't know where the hell he got the idea heterosexuality was the way for him to go), but it had a snarky writer poncing about naked so I forgive it everything.

-Callisto
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

apocalypsos: (Default)
tatty bojangles

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags