Page Summary
laughingrat.livejournal.com - (no subject)
caitirin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
prettyveela.livejournal.com - Ugh to Bill
insidian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
florahart - (no subject)
channonyarrow.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bcgphoenix - (no subject)
apocalypsos.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tviokh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gypsyjr.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bibliotech.livejournal.com - (no subject)
miggy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
scarlett78.livejournal.com - (no subject)
apocalypsos.livejournal.com - (no subject)
paradisacorbasi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
palmetto.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ciara-belle.livejournal.com - (no subject)
laughingrat.livejournal.com - (no subject)
coyotegoth.livejournal.com - (no subject)
robyn-ma.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jim-smith.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hemlock-martini.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jedilora.livejournal.com - (no subject)
apocalypsos.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lasarus.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Beechy for Bases by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:03 pm (UTC)girls marrying girls = giant freaking dinosaurs o.O???
Ugh to Bill
Date: 2005-04-13 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:06 pm (UTC)Gay marriages in mirror may be closer than they seem. Uh...
Because gay people eat goats. No...
Tangled-together gay people falling from the ceiling are always a show-stopper. Well, maybe, but I fail to see...
OH. Because gay people can be cloned from DNA onaccounta it's inborn! Woo!
Except that's far to CLOSE to rational for him. Dammit.
*fails*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:06 pm (UTC)How about letting retrograde Neanderthal conservatives have talk shows? Isn't that the same thing?
Actually, now I want to go to every neocon ever and say "You get to be a conservative and as much of an asshat as you desire and try to fuck up the country as much as you can, and I get to be married to my girlfriend and NEITHER of us gets to kill the other, or even stop the other. Because I am thisclose to starting a jihad. Against you."
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:07 pm (UTC)Please to be explaining.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:12 pm (UTC)Like...a Billy O'Reilly?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:21 pm (UTC)Well that's something new and different. Normally we have Rick Santorum talking about "screwing" with nature. ;D
Grr...O'Reilly is such an ass.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:29 pm (UTC)The unintended consquences of Jurassic Park were dinosaurs eating people. The unintended consequences of gay marriage is santorum all over the nice sheets your brother gave you at the reception.
You know why this analogy really doesn't work? Any three-year-old can see the precise stupidity in cloning hundreds of dinosaurs for a theme park, because if you didn't know that was going to happen you wouldn't watch the movie. But the social side effects of gay marriage aren't nearly as obvious, which is why O'Reilly has to compare them to Jurassic Park because he doesn't know why it's bad either. Note that in Jurassic Park, Ian Malcolm never has to compare the park to something else to make his point, because he can just say "this is dumb because the dinosaurs will eat us."
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:30 pm (UTC)YAAAAY! Despite already being in a straight marriage I will now run out and marry the first guy I see! Won't he be surprised! Unless he's a lawyer, and that means easy divorce! YAAAAY!
So...happiness, love, security, contentment and family growth are "unintended consequences" now?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 06:39 pm (UTC)