(no subject)

[apocalypsos]

Bill O'Reilly just compared gay marriage to the plot of Jurassic Park.

*headdesk*

Comments

[laughingrat.livejournal.com]

Whu?

[apocalypsos.livejournal.com]

Per his words, screwing with nature leads to unintended consequences. Or something. *shrug*

[bibliotech.livejournal.com]

screwing with nature leads to unintended consequences.

Like...a Billy O'Reilly?

[miss-katelynne.livejournal.com]

Like Bill O'Reilly + Falafel = OTP!!!!

[palmetto.livejournal.com]

I know that when my friend Mikey meets a boy, it always ends in a small annoying child being electrocuted on a fence.

[paynbow.livejournal.com]

*snicker*

[laughingrat.livejournal.com]

I'll follow his surreal reasoning when the natural history museums start doing dioramas captioned "When Homos Ruled the Earth."

[jim-smith.livejournal.com]

Unintended consequences?

The unintended consquences of Jurassic Park were dinosaurs eating people. The unintended consequences of gay marriage is santorum all over the nice sheets your brother gave you at the reception.

You know why this analogy really doesn't work? Any three-year-old can see the precise stupidity in cloning hundreds of dinosaurs for a theme park, because if you didn't know that was going to happen you wouldn't watch the movie. But the social side effects of gay marriage aren't nearly as obvious, which is why O'Reilly has to compare them to Jurassic Park because he doesn't know why it's bad either. Note that in Jurassic Park, Ian Malcolm never has to compare the park to something else to make his point, because he can just say "this is dumb because the dinosaurs will eat us."

[anne-jumps.livejournal.com]

So marriage exists in nature? It's not something people invented to control women?