(no subject)
Apr. 21st, 2005 10:47 amIn case you haven't seen the link yet, the South Carolina State House passed a bill cracking down on gamecock fighting and tabled a bill protecting victims of domestic violence. As you can read in the article, Rep. John Graham Altman then proceeded to use the occasion to behave like a complete and total asstard.
But the good things is, everybody stepped to call him on it.
But the good things is, everybody stepped to call him on it.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:01 pm (UTC)My Gods. Yeah, that's a complete and total asstard all right. Man. I didn't know I had that much rage left in me tonight. I mean, it's nearly bedtime, I should be winding down. Fuck.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:09 pm (UTC)Ah, yes, the welfare of cocks is more important than the welfare of women beaten in their own homes. That makes perfect sense. In Bizarro World.
I wonder if it was called Rooster-Fighting if things would be different.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:14 pm (UTC)There are days that I just LOVE my state.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:21 pm (UTC)Sweet mother Goddess. There actually is that level of stupid!
I'm still convinced we all shifted into some bizarre parallel dimension and we just weren't told about it.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:23 pm (UTC)Of course, I think domestic abuse should be a felony on the first strike. Zero tolerance policy. Jail time, plus the victim seizes all of his assets. That's one where I don't understand in the least why we have any soft-pedalling, particularly in my own conservative community, where we're supposed to be protecting marriage. Nothing is a bigger threat to marriage than any acceptance of domestic abuse.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:39 pm (UTC)As for his assertion that there should never be a second offense. From a certain point of view I get that. I can't imagine ever sticking around after somebody who claimed to love me, hit me. I wouldn't do it. I also understand that I am pretty lucky. I've got good self-esteem, and truly believe I deserve better than that. I've yet to meet the person I was afraid of, and I've known some pretty violent people in my lifetime. And most of all, I grew up in an environment where hitting someone was never the solution to a problem. Every incident of my life tells me that hitting people is never okay. Many women in abusive relationships just don't have that kind of security. Often their self-esteem has been systematically destroyed before the physical abuse ever began, so that they are at a point in their life when not only do they truly believe this guy is the best they can get, but they believe they have to have a man because they aren't good enough to survive in the big bad world on their own. Many are afraid, not only for their own lives, but for the lives of their children or friends. Abusive men threaten, and many of them have no qualms about threatening the friend whose house you're staying at or your children. There's the added threat of just taking the kids, and it seems credible to many women, particularly women who have been shown just how unimportant domestic violence is to the courts. They may not have any job skills, no way to support children, and the guy will be telling them how they're an unfit mother and he'll prove it to the courts. And many people didn't grow up with the knowledge that hitting and more important being hit is never okay. Many women in abusive relationships had mothers who were in abusive relationships. They weren't taught that this was a bad thing they should get out of at all costs. They were taught this is the proper and appropriate way for men to treat their husbands. I can't emotionally understand women who stay, my brain isn't wired that way. I pray that I never can. But rationally, I get it.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:43 pm (UTC)There's always people stupid enough to vote for asshats, you know? So yeah, I agree with you. He'll get re-elected.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:45 pm (UTC)I'm still royally pissed off. The follow up was just.. RICH too. :|
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:20 pm (UTC)A bill protecting cocks passed through the House Judiciary Committee.
...actually, one probably has; cocks are clearly more important than any area of the feminine body...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:36 pm (UTC)His views seem...ironic, considering one of the first child abuse cases in America was actually tried under a law prohibiting animal cruelty.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 05:39 pm (UTC)It's not right, and nobody deserves to be hurt. But it goes like that.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 06:35 pm (UTC)And, of course, intelligence or the lack thereof rarely has anything to do with a person's reasons for staying in an abusive relationship anyway, so the protection is even more important in those instances.
Is it that difficult that abusing someone for no good reason should be against some law somewhere? o_o This guy makes me wonder.
-Callisto
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 06:40 pm (UTC)Thanks
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 06:40 pm (UTC)All that said, whoever came up with the brilliant idea that whopping the wife around is only a misdemeanor needs to be whomped senseless himself.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 06:48 pm (UTC)-Callisto
no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 08:01 pm (UTC)