(no subject)
Jun. 21st, 2006 05:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
... the fuck?!
Okay, so let me see if I've got Jeb Bush's ethics straight here.
Severely disabled persons on life support should be kept alive regardless of the emotional, mental, physical, and financial pains to everyone involved because a ridiculously low quality of life is better than no life at all.
But if some sick son of a bitch knocks up a severely disabled woman against her will, screw her.
EDIT: More info on the case. Apparently, it all happened in 2004, but it's still pretty creepy.
Okay, so let me see if I've got Jeb Bush's ethics straight here.
Severely disabled persons on life support should be kept alive regardless of the emotional, mental, physical, and financial pains to everyone involved because a ridiculously low quality of life is better than no life at all.
But if some sick son of a bitch knocks up a severely disabled woman against her will, screw her.
EDIT: More info on the case. Apparently, it all happened in 2004, but it's still pretty creepy.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 09:48 pm (UTC)I hate feeling as though I would kill someone were I ever to meet them.
That is inhuman.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 09:55 pm (UTC)He's playing games and making a stupid point with the lives of both mother and foetus.
Bastard.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:03 pm (UTC)...I think I just answered my own question. The fucked-up, it is strong in the Bush family.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:11 pm (UTC)*sporks with intent*
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:14 pm (UTC)Fucktards, all of them.
*scowl*
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 02:31 am (UTC)...Maybe that's his plan. I've heard that Jeb doesn't want to run for President in '08, so this may be his way of preempitvely preventing a nomination.
November.
Date: 2006-06-21 10:15 pm (UTC)Now if we can just figure out a way to make him STOP TALKING!!!! The man totally didn't catch a clue during the Schiavo fiasco.
Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-21 10:18 pm (UTC)Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-21 10:18 pm (UTC)Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-21 10:25 pm (UTC)If the party loses the White House in 2008, they'll probably rethink the plan, but as of right now that ship is largely considered to have sailed.
It was actually supposed to be a Bush Brothers ticket in 2000 (little known insider fact) with Jeb on top, but that was predicated on Jeb winning the Florida governorship in 1994.
Which, I am proud to say, we managed to block at the eleventh hour.
I'll tell you what to look out for -- Jeb taking over FEMA once he's out of Tallahassee.
Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-21 10:29 pm (UTC)That's kind of like putting Arthur Bach in charge of Alcoholics Anonymous, isn't it?
Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-22 01:11 am (UTC)Oh, my god. -hauls mind up out of gutter, watches it giggle madly- ohhhh, my god.
I'll tell you what to look out for -- Jeb taking over FEMA once he's out of Tallahassee
J"eb for FEMA (because it's not fucked up enough)" -nods-
-ceases random hacking of your reply to get a two-fer to tp's post- -waves to tp, too 'hi, trollprincess'-
Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-22 08:43 am (UTC)Oh, my god. -hauls mind up out of gutter, watches it giggle madly- ohhhh, my god.
I'm glad to see I wasn't the only one who thought, "Dubya bottoming...yeah, that makes sense," before realizing that I'd taken the statement the wrong way.
Re: November.
Date: 2006-06-22 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:21 pm (UTC)Anti-choice activists always say that the life of the fetus is as important but not more important than the life of the mother. Doesn't this kind of, you know, go against that?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:22 pm (UTC)Severely disabled persons on life support should be kept alive regardless of the emotional, mental, physical, and financial pains to everyone involved because a ridiculously low quality of life is better than no life at all.
Actually, from what I've observed and read, that's not quite correct. Severely disabled persons...etc.... should be kept alive on life support as long as the family has money to fork over for it. As soon as they're bankrupt, pull the plug.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:26 pm (UTC)It's like a family contest. Whoever is the most repellent human being the week before Sunday dinner gets the biggest slice of pie.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:17 pm (UTC)Jeb Bush, best candidate for male pregnancy on the PLANET. Can we get on that, seriously?
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 08:47 am (UTC)They're guys named BUSH--which not only connotes "bush league," but which is also a slang term for the female genitals. As a result, they act doubly, even triply like dicks 24/7. Just to prove that despite their surname, they're NOT pussy.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:31 pm (UTC)He seems to think that his misguided crusade to save a child will indeed save a child - but what if what he saves is born missing a brain stem or worse? Are we as a nation supposed to sit back and watch a small lump of flesh breathe and suffer on the news for his moral edification?
If all thise ass wants to do is think of the child then he should actually THINK of the child.
That was what went through my head before thinking of the poor disabled woman's suffering. She's got misery in spades without the pregnancy simply from the rape. Ostensibly she's not "with it" enough to recognize or understand the implications of pregnancy - but she is cogent enough to understand the pain and trauma (physical and psychological) of rape. She needs a guardian willing to sue Jeb Bush for adding to her mental duress on top of okaying an abortion >:(
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 12:14 am (UTC)It'll be just like when he was growing up.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 02:10 am (UTC)And you totally win at internet.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 09:04 pm (UTC)I am pro-choice. But I am confused by the anger in this entry. (Bear with me, I'm not just trolling for reactions here.)
What exactly is wrong with this woman carrying the fetus to term?
As far as I can tell, this woman does not seem to have any expicit objection to carrying the fetus. (I grant that she has the capacity of a pre-schooler, but let's just take the objections one step at a time.)
The judge is not so much refusing to give her what she wants as he is deciding what is in her best interest. An abortion could be traumatizing to a preschooler. (Note that this is NOT the same as a judge making decisions for you or me. SOMEONE must make all her decisions for her.)
I would hazard to propose that the judge - of all people in her life, including herself and the rights activists that have lobbied on both sides of the issue - appears to be the one doing The Right Thing.
Is it possible that all this anger is simply indignance that this woman has been violated? Will everyone's anger be assuaged if that baby is wiped from our existence? Out of sight, out of mind?
The crime here is that she was raped, definitely, but I don't see how aborting the fetus changes that.
Again, I am pro-choice. I just don't see that this woman is being denied anything. The judge is acting as her guardian.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-23 01:32 am (UTC)