They're just ignoring the hell out of Terminator 3, aren't they? *snickers*
(Not that I blame them, really. I'll gleefully admit that I love the third movie, but I also love it knowing full well they bought my love with a movie-ending global nuclear apocalypse.)
EDIT: Stupid. Heh.
PET CYBORG OF EDIT: I love Summer Glau THIS MUCH. BUNCHES. BUNCHES AND BUNCHES AND BUNCHES. And I seriously knew a "9-11? What's that?" line was coming up.
SNOTTY COP OF EDIT: I didn't hear the couple of lines after "They will dress you like a flannel sock" because I was laughing so hard. Oh, show.
GROSS ROAD WORKER OF EDIT: The only thing that's making me feel positively orgasmic about any discussion between Cameron and Sarah (YOU GIVE GOOD DIALOGUE MMMM) is that thanks to John they inevitably break that rule about two women being in a scene together and talking about something other than a guy.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA EDIT: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I don't feel the need to explain myart sarcastic laughter to you, Warren.
HEY IT'S THAT GUY OF EDIT: Okay, fine, I'll explain my laughter. It comes in two parts.
1. Lawrence?!
2.Bomb Baum?!
(Not that I blame them, really. I'll gleefully admit that I love the third movie, but I also love it knowing full well they bought my love with a movie-ending global nuclear apocalypse.)
EDIT: Stupid. Heh.
PET CYBORG OF EDIT: I love Summer Glau THIS MUCH. BUNCHES. BUNCHES AND BUNCHES AND BUNCHES. And I seriously knew a "9-11? What's that?" line was coming up.
SNOTTY COP OF EDIT: I didn't hear the couple of lines after "They will dress you like a flannel sock" because I was laughing so hard. Oh, show.
GROSS ROAD WORKER OF EDIT: The only thing that's making me feel positively orgasmic about any discussion between Cameron and Sarah (YOU GIVE GOOD DIALOGUE MMMM) is that thanks to John they inevitably break that rule about two women being in a scene together and talking about something other than a guy.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA EDIT: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I don't feel the need to explain my
HEY IT'S THAT GUY OF EDIT: Okay, fine, I'll explain my laughter. It comes in two parts.
1. Lawrence?!
2.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 04:12 am (UTC)IGN TV: Are you working within the continuity of the Terminator movies, specifically Terminator 3?
Friedman: We're gonna go off on our own. I think the thing about T3 is, obviously there was just no Sarah Connor and that's something the fans were never happy with. I don't even think the people who made T3 were happy with that. It just wasn't a choice of theirs. You know, Linda Hamilton was going through some things and didn't want to be a part of it. They had a script at one point I know; there was a T3 that had Sarah in it. I've never read it. I don't know anything about it. But I know that they did and they wanted to do that. They wanted it to be kind of her trilogy, and it never could be. So I think that my feeling was this TV series to me sort of serves as the third act to that trilogy - what could have happened had we followed that after T2. So I almost think of this as T3. To me it takes the place of T3. But also I think that sort of in the spirit of Terminator, it's an alternate timeline. I know a lot of people get very worked up about the continuity and the canon and all that stuff. What I try to do is stay very, very true to the first two movies and then sort of take it from there. But always remain true to the spirit of everyone's intent and again, take some time with this woman and explore what maybe would have happened.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:21 am (UTC)(Oh my god, I should not like this show NEARLY AS MUCH AS I DO. But it is making me GIDDY.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:32 am (UTC)question
Date: 2008-01-15 02:35 am (UTC)Re: question
Date: 2008-01-15 02:39 am (UTC)Re: question
Date: 2008-01-15 02:54 am (UTC)Re: question
Date: 2008-01-15 02:39 am (UTC)Honestly, though? I cannot STAND Schwartzenegger and the Terminator series are some of my favorites. Turns out playing an emotionless cyborg makes him fairly tolerable. It's when he actually tries to act that it gets a little painful. :)
Re: question
Date: 2008-01-15 02:56 am (UTC)And I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one who isn't a fan of Schwartzenegger. Thanks again!
Re: question
Date: 2008-01-15 05:36 am (UTC)Schwartzenegger is the bad guy in the first film so I don't mind him in it, the second one where you are supposed to form an attachment to him is slightly more annoying.
Re: question
Date: 2008-01-15 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 02:44 am (UTC)(And okay, yeah, I had to check Wikipedia for the dates. Bad fan. *smacks own hand*)
Think of it as a reaction.
Date: 2008-01-15 03:08 am (UTC)Awww, the future leader of the human race is a Momma's boy.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-15 05:51 am (UTC)Kingdom Hearts is really cutting into my TV show time. Siiiigh. I'm sure I can find it somewhere.