Page Summary
channonyarrow.livejournal.com - Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
deirdre-c.livejournal.com - (no subject)
squee1123.livejournal.com - (no subject)
affectingly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
laurelin-kit.livejournal.com - (no subject)
phaballa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wiredwizard.livejournal.com - (no subject)
moonpupy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
exsequar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
escritoireazul.livejournal.com - (no subject)
theliel.livejournal.com - New Wonderella perfectly on point...
Style Credit
- Style: Beechy for Bases by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-10 07:21 pm (UTC)And B) Anne Rice's books don't sell that well. I hate this misconception in the fringes of the publishing industry that she makes just absolute bank (this can be a rant where Laurell Hamilton is subbed in, as well) so we should do EXACTLY LIKE SHE DOES. Her Christ book, released last month, is only 857 on B&N's sales charts.
I realise that Breaking Dawn has a movie coming out this week, and that that is spiking sales, but at the same time, THAT book, which we all know because we have watched Cleolinda read and recap at her own peril is crap, is ranked number 9.
I'm kind of not proving my point, except for how my ACTUAL point is that people need to quit thinking that readers think that Anne Rice (or Laurell Hamilton) are the greatest publishing phenoms since Gutenberg - they're really, really not, and paranormal romance is the new Sarah Palin.
Re: Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-10 07:26 pm (UTC)AGREED. I totally died. heeee.
Re: Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-10 08:08 pm (UTC)Re: Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-10 09:02 pm (UTC)Re: Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-11 03:24 am (UTC)Re: Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-10 07:33 pm (UTC)Re: Editing because I cannot make a user tag work.
Date: 2008-11-10 07:38 pm (UTC)Part of my annoyance with them is that in my last job as an editor, I was supposed to launch a paranormal romance line, and it took a lot of arguing before I talked them out of, basically, a fairly suicidal course of action (partly this was their knowledge of their demographic). And then they managed to fuck up anyway, so I have a lot of annoyance there.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 07:45 pm (UTC)We're going to see it separately because she thinks I'm going to ruin it for her. Which ... heh, fair enough, considering I may go for a death wish and wear my "Bella Swan is a smug self-centered twit and Edward Cullen is a creepy sparkly stalker" shirt.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 01:58 pm (UTC)It'll prolly burn thier brains.
also, the shirt, it is awesum.
if the wife hadn't just got handed 2 'extra' weeks of unpaid time off i would pick one up.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 08:09 pm (UTC)Also, I cannot WAIT to see this shit. I'm actually driving an hour so I can go to the midnight release with my best friend. We want to be among the first to MOCK. \o/
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 08:18 pm (UTC)Obligatory Reference
Date: 2008-11-11 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 08:52 pm (UTC)I think that now every time I see Dracula come up in a movie, Carry On My Wayward Son will play in the soundtrack that runs in the back of my head..
I'm just glad there's no-one who can talk me into going to see this movie. I only see movies w/ 2 people any more, and neither would be caught =ded= seeing it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 09:05 pm (UTC)This has *totally* *ruined* Carry on My Wayward Son for a serious SPN song. Pure and total ruinage.
Now it's Dracula mockage. With sniggering and snorting.
::dies laughing::
no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-10 10:39 pm (UTC)New Wonderella perfectly on point...
Date: 2008-11-11 04:32 pm (UTC)