(no subject)
Nov. 11th, 2004 06:54 pmSpotted on IMDb ...
Religious conservatives and family-values groups are planning to wage a battle against Fox Searchlight's Kinsey, about the pioneering sex researcher, when the movie opens in limited release on Friday. In a statement on Wednesday, Robert Knight of Concerned Women for America charged that the movie "lionized" a man whose "proper place is with Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele or your average Hollywood horror flick mad scientist." Knight went on to assert that Kinsey "was the godfather of the homosexual activist movement, the campaign to mainstream pornography, and even the campaign to strike down abortion laws." The youth group Generation Life, composed of "virgins and renewed virgins," announced that it would picket theaters showing the film. And the conservative WorldNetDaily.com has taken aim at the movie in the current issue of its monthly magazine Whistleblower, in which it charges that Kinsey transformed America "in five decades from the Leave It to Beaver innocence of the 1950s to today's wanton, 'anything-goes' sexual anarchy." (EDIT: I believe I should add here that with a dirty enough mind and a slight shift in punctuation, there is no real difference between leave-it-to-beaver innocence and "anything goes" sexual anarchy". I'm just sayin'. ANOTHER EDIT: Okay, not much of a difference. ;))
And, you know, Finding Neverland is coming out this weekend and I'm going to go if I hit a word quota for NaNoWriMo that I'm happy with, but I'm horribly tempted to go see Kinsey if it means annoying protesting religious conservatives. And maybe they could question my sex life. That could be amusing. *evil cackle*
And what the hell is "renewed virgin" supposed to mean, anyway? (Note: That was a rhetorical question. I know what stupid excuses they'd give for being "renewed" virgins. Nobody needs to give me an explanation of the term, but thanks anyway.) I'd just like to get into an argument with a really nutty protester who's not half as virginal as I am. ;)
EDIT: Shot shows promise as male contraceptive -- Oh, and I'm sure that since guys can't get pregnant, that shot'll get passed out like it's friggin' candy. *glares*
HEY, I FOUND ANOTHER EDIT UNDER THE COUCH CUSHIONS!: There are protestors out by the street, and I have no idea who they are or what they're protesting or, for that matter, which building they're protesting. The curiosity, it kills me dead. *resists the urge to leave work to go out and ask, since New Bossman already said no*
Religious conservatives and family-values groups are planning to wage a battle against Fox Searchlight's Kinsey, about the pioneering sex researcher, when the movie opens in limited release on Friday. In a statement on Wednesday, Robert Knight of Concerned Women for America charged that the movie "lionized" a man whose "proper place is with Nazi Dr. Josef Mengele or your average Hollywood horror flick mad scientist." Knight went on to assert that Kinsey "was the godfather of the homosexual activist movement, the campaign to mainstream pornography, and even the campaign to strike down abortion laws." The youth group Generation Life, composed of "virgins and renewed virgins," announced that it would picket theaters showing the film. And the conservative WorldNetDaily.com has taken aim at the movie in the current issue of its monthly magazine Whistleblower, in which it charges that Kinsey transformed America "in five decades from the Leave It to Beaver innocence of the 1950s to today's wanton, 'anything-goes' sexual anarchy." (EDIT: I believe I should add here that with a dirty enough mind and a slight shift in punctuation, there is no real difference between leave-it-to-beaver innocence and "anything goes" sexual anarchy". I'm just sayin'. ANOTHER EDIT: Okay, not much of a difference. ;))
And, you know, Finding Neverland is coming out this weekend and I'm going to go if I hit a word quota for NaNoWriMo that I'm happy with, but I'm horribly tempted to go see Kinsey if it means annoying protesting religious conservatives. And maybe they could question my sex life. That could be amusing. *evil cackle*
And what the hell is "renewed virgin" supposed to mean, anyway? (Note: That was a rhetorical question. I know what stupid excuses they'd give for being "renewed" virgins. Nobody needs to give me an explanation of the term, but thanks anyway.) I'd just like to get into an argument with a really nutty protester who's not half as virginal as I am. ;)
EDIT: Shot shows promise as male contraceptive -- Oh, and I'm sure that since guys can't get pregnant, that shot'll get passed out like it's friggin' candy. *glares*
HEY, I FOUND ANOTHER EDIT UNDER THE COUCH CUSHIONS!: There are protestors out by the street, and I have no idea who they are or what they're protesting or, for that matter, which building they're protesting. The curiosity, it kills me dead. *resists the urge to leave work to go out and ask, since New Bossman already said no*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:07 pm (UTC)Robert Knight of Concerned Women for America
I mean, seriously, what the technicolor frell is up with that? "Robert" doesn't sound like a woman's name to me, concerned or otherwise, and somebody ought to ask him about that shit.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:07 pm (UTC)That was my very first thought when I read that!
(no subject)
From:"renewed virgins"
Date: 2004-11-11 04:08 pm (UTC)I'm not all that interested in Kinsey, but I was sort of considering seing it b/c it's Liam...now I may just have to make sure I do.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:09 pm (UTC)*jaw hits floor*
Because when it comes to evil, telling people sex is OK is right up there with torturing Jews.
I'd say I fear for humanity, but someone that delusional can't be human.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:17 pm (UTC)OK, now I'm really scared.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:18 pm (UTC)Whoever brings up the Nazis first loses, right?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:45 pm (UTC)Uh. And in today's Brave New BizarroAmerika, these are BAD things? Sheesh...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(over from metaquotes)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 04:51 pm (UTC)Damnit.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:05 pm (UTC)*blinks*
Sex is now synonymous with the Holocaust? Jesus H. Christ on a fucking pogo-stick, what reality is this asshole from?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 05:54 pm (UTC)I love how he says Kinsey caused all those changes in sexual attitudes from the Eden we had in the 50s, when from my understanding, all he did was document what was already there.
Yes, people were gay in the 50's, too, my "religious conservative" friends. And for many, many years before that.
I hate people sometimes.
-blue
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:07 pm (UTC)Now I want to see more.
Anyone accused of causing so much sex can't be that bad.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:45 pm (UTC)http://mousewords.blogspot.com/2004/11/conservative-groups-denounce-kinsey.html
no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 04:54 am (UTC)Is it just me that finds the idea that we don't have sexual desires more insulting to my womanhood?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 06:47 pm (UTC)They can officially suck my left one.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 07:46 pm (UTC)Indiana U is my alma mater, and the Kinsey Institute is old news there. We are rather proud of it and surprised that more people don't know more about it. I am definitely going to see it as soon as I figure out where it's at. (You'd think in DC it would be easy to find...maybe Bush's conservative minions aren't allowing it in the theaters...?)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 08:20 pm (UTC)-blue
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 07:54 pm (UTC)Dammit, there's no WAY that movie's showing around here...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 08:01 pm (UTC)You know, there's jumping to conclusions, and then there's playing fucking leapfrog with them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 09:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-11 09:46 pm (UTC)Heh. In high school for sex ed. they had us roll dice to show the odds of pregnancy from unprotected sex. I kept rolling sixes. It got to the point where people were gathering around. Usually I have terrible luck, but, well, I guess what's worse than `accidentally' getting someone pregnant is getting a whole lot of people pregnant concurrently.
I particularly like this part: `most of which regained their fertility when the treatments were stopped'.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 04:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 06:03 am (UTC)I am a man, and would vote for equal rights and medicine coverage for women.
The majority of congress is male.
Am I unique in this belief, or is congress full of sexists?
Is it possible for a not sexist man to be elected?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 08:09 am (UTC)That's exactly the reason that there's been the wave of widely marketed drugs for incredibly general symptoms - like generalized anxiety disorder type stuff - instead of serious, focused research into disease cures. Not enough of a return for the investment. You can convince almost anyone that they need drugs for nervousness but [thankfully] you can't convince somene that they have a life threatening illness.
(no subject)
From: