apocalypsos: (walt)
[personal profile] apocalypsos
I mean, it's not like I don't get why people would think he made a mistake in killing Ethan. And in some ways, yeah, it was a mistake. Ethan is, aside from Danielle, the only person who has any idea what's up with that island, and they may have been able to get some answers from Ethan.

Therein lies the problem.

They may have been able to get some answers from the guy. Charlie had a point in that regard. We're talking about a guy who lied that he was another one of of the castaways, who masqueraded for weeks as one of their own without bothering to either share information or reveal who he really was. And he did all of this to kidnap a pregnant woman, presumably to take her baby. Does anyone honestly think that he would talked under interrogation, and if he did, would his answers have been truthful and complete? No. Considering his past history, his answers would have been questionable and probably not the entire story. At this point, Danielle has more of a truthful history than Ethan ever did, and considering how physically tough and mentally unstable he seemed to be, I don't think Sayid's torture techniques would have worked.

Also, I doubt a guy who's been living on that island for God knows how long (and may, in fact, have the same sort of "disease" that Danielle's people had) is all that sane. As a comparison, you have Danielle, who is just as mentally unbalanced due to "cabin fever" as Ethan was but is relatively harmless. When I say that, it's because she has not of yet breached the castaways and their safety to attack them. Ethan weaseled his way into their midst, after seeing their plane crash and -- since they checked the manifest for the funeral service -- watching them for a while before joining their group. And he did all of that with a malicious intent, unlike Danielle, who has not re-emerged from the jungle. We're talking about a sociopath here, and, if he had succeeded in his attempt to murder Charlie, a serial killer. (Actually, he'd have to kill three before he's even considered a serial killer by the proper authorities, but let's not even get into that.)

Even with all of that, Ethan is a major threat, reasons for which Locke already helpfully pointed out in the last episode. He knows the island better than they do. To him, they're just a bunch of scared people with sticks. And yes, now they have guns -- and only a hundred rounds. If they had captured him, and he had escaped, something that with his strengths was probably inevitable ... well, if I were him, I would now know they had guns, and I'd take them or the ammo with me.

In any event, there's Charlie.

Charlie still bears the scars of Ethan's attempt on his life, both physically and mentally. He feels he has failed Claire, whom he swore to protect only minutes before Ethan abducted them both. And being confronted with the man who killed him and abducted his best friend on the island cannot have put him in the best frame of mind.

You come face to face with the man who murdered you. What do you do?

Yes, maybe you could hold back from killing him in revenge. Maybe. We all like to think we're better people than that, but we're also sitting at home in front of our computers, cozy and comfy with junk food and loud music on a Saturday afternoon. We're not trapped on an island, with no escape from a dangerous madman, a person who's already threatened your life and the lives of others. At this point, what is the difference between Ethan and the polar bears, aside from the fact that Ethan might give them information?

And not only that, but there's also the protection aspect for Charlie. His main goal right now is making up for his earlier failure by protecting Claire. And let me tell you, this whole situation wouldn't disturb me so much and I might not be backing him up so much if this weren't the second time in three months a pregnant woman in the real world has been attacked for her unborn child. And I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "But that's not the same thing." No, in the details, it's not. But in the broader spectrum, it's still a woman being attacked or abducted so that her unborn child can be taken from her. (I'd love to discuss alternate theories on Ethan's motivations, but so far, the writers really haven't given us anything else to work with.) In this instance, the victim had to go so far as to kill the woman attacking her for the child. In the first, the victim didn't succeed. If Ethan is in the same mindset as both of these attackers, then keeping him alive is far too dangerous. (Now, granted, he kept Claire for days and didn't take the child, but it's possible that he was either waiting for her to come to term and deliver naturally before "disposing" of her, or she's just as important as her child to his plans.)

As for the answers they could have gotten from Ethan, what's to say the castaways can't get the same answers or better from Danielle? Considering both her and Ethan's physical ages, she's probably been there longer, and she's seeing it from a saner perspective -- the perspective of the victimized woman. Now would be a good time for Sayid and some of the other castaways to take a trip to find Danielle and ask her anything they might have wanted to learn from Ethan, but probably wouldn't have gotten a straight answer to.

In the end, the castaways might not be as vehement about asking questions of Ethan than they might think. Asking questions of Ethan -- how long he's been there, what he really wants, etc. -- establishes a permanence in their stay on the island that they might not want to confront. Yes, they are realistic enought to know that help isn't coming soon, or at all, but they haven't gone back to question Danielle yet, almost as if they're ignoring her. And why not? She's been there sixteen years, and looks it. Who wants serious confirmation of something that long-lasting? Aside from the maps and notes Sayid boosted, they've pushed her entirely from their mind aside from the occasional comment in discussions which quickly turn back to other topics. It's bad enough facing that you might be on that island for not weeks or months, but maybe years and frighteningly enough, possibly decades.

*exhales*

Sorry. Had to rant. :)

Date: 2005-02-12 06:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cleolinda.livejournal.com
I totally agree, man. People argued this point with me on the recap, but I stand by my original statement: in this case, the smart money kills the bad guy. He is so clearly 1) psychotic, 2) stronger than they are, 3) wilier than they are, and 4) at an environmental advantage to them that the risks of leaving him alive and in their midst vastly outweigh the advantages of trying to make him talk. I mean, God bless the castaways, but imagine these fools trying to hold Ethan captive. Before a single night had passed, he would have gotten loose, escaped, possibly screwed with someone's head and pulled them over to his side, killed someone else, and/or rekidnapped Claire. Not killing him is the kind of dumb shit people pull in horror movies, and I was glad someone finally did the smart thing for once.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:42 pm (UTC)

Date: 2005-02-12 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
YES. And it keeps occurring to me that if they had kept him alive and captured him, the same people who are calling Charlie stupid for shooting Ethan now would have been calling him stupid again for not shooting him if Ethan escaped and killed someone else. *sigh*

Date: 2005-02-12 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foresthouse.livejournal.com
I agree with you on this one. I think it was the smart move.

Also, the Other Man theory? Is nice. But on my metro ride today, I was mentally rearranging letters, and you know what?

Ethan could also be

THE ROMAN

or just bigger THAN ROME.

Hmm. Maybe he's from an ancient civilization?

Hehe, sorry. My brain does these things while I'm riding the metro. It can't help itself!

Date: 2005-02-12 06:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secretbutterfly.livejournal.com
I feel the same way. Especially re: Charlie'sactions. And consider the flashback with Lucy! Ethan was bound to escape and cause more trouble.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dargie.livejournal.com
Hey, I totally agree with Charlie. Ethan was a danger, particularly to Claire and the baby. How they thought they were going to hold him is beyond me. He's an accomplished liar and possibly insane. And even if Sayid was willing to go the whole hog interrogating him, I don't know that they'd get anything out of him. They're all safer with him dead, if we can believe that his motivations were malign. And I tend to considering what he did to Charlie.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foreverrogue.livejournal.com
Charlie's shooting of Ethan was a bit surprising. I didn't expect it to be him, though I should have. Of course, I'm still playing catch-up with some of the episodes.

I don't blame him for what he did. Ethan was a danger. Who is to say what he told them would be the truth? The danger he posed to the group far outweighed any answers he could/might have given them about his origins. He would have gone after Claire again. He would have killed again. The island had no jails, they had no where to lock him away for what he did (Boone and Locke are still diggung up that underground thing, which is where I would have suggested putting Ethan after it had been explored, but the problem would be what to do with him until then). Their options were sadly limited and Charlie simply provided them with a violent solution.

Poor Charlie, though... I feel for him.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:44 pm (UTC)
yueni: fantasy bosom (Default)
From: [personal profile] yueni
Incorrect. I'm completely backing Charlie on this too. Sure, it would have been nice to get some answers, but if you think of all that he's been through, bet I'd have done the exact same thing in his shoes.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iphignia939.livejournal.com
See, I don't get *why* anyone thought they could get any answers out of Ethan, period. Oh, yes, because you're totally going to break the evil guy who doesn't make any noise when he walks and can come out of the water to break every bone in poor Scott's body. Riiiiight.

Seriously. Smart money kills him so he can't, you know, *get away*.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
I could see Ethan only giving answers if they were totally wrong, but getting a sick thrill about sending one or more of them into a dangerous situation. Like saying, "Oh, this is the cave I live in," and then giving them directions to whereever the jungle monster sleeps.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iphignia939.livejournal.com
*snicker*

But no, there's no way in hell he'd give them factual information. He'd just bide his time until he could get away, then go back to killing people and stalking Claire and her wee unborn miracle baby.

And God love him, Boone would probably be on sentry duty at the time, and fall asleep. Or trip over something.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] callmesyd.livejournal.com
Of course, then we'd have people theorizing that "OMG ETHAN IS TEH MECHASAUR!!!"

Which would be kind of cool, actually. Maybe he's just been doing that Obi-Wan Kenobi Scare-the-Sand-People screamy thingie. XD

Date: 2005-02-12 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dhaunea.livejournal.com
Actually, my money was on Sawyer shooting Ethan, out of sheer practicality. It's probably a good thing that Charlie did it, as he at least has the excuse of what he was put through by the man.

If Sawyer'd done it they'd probably have lynched him.

Date: 2005-02-12 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
Exactly. If anybody on that island has reason to do it, it's Charlie. The only one who has an equal amount of reason is Claire, and she doesn't even remember him.

If Sawyer would have done it, he would have been even more of a pariah than he is now. And then he actually made good arguments as to why keeping Ethan alive is stupid, and they'd call him names or something. *eye roll*

Date: 2005-02-13 01:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] myniamh.livejournal.com
I think the other Men With Guns (and Kate) might have known where this was going (especially Houdini!Kate), they may not have liked it, may not have even conciously thought in that direction but Locke and Sawyer are too practical.
Sawyer was up the front with the gun, and has shown that he will use it at the slightest chance but I think you're right, the group would have been able to sit on their high horse and condem Sawyer when he was 'supposed' to shoot Ethan, as they wern't going to 'hurt' him and would be blameless.

I think there would have been a point after capturing Ethan, if that was ever going to happen, and talking, I don't belive they would have either tortured or got any answers, where they would have been able to hurt him.
He is far too good at manipulation, instead of hitting Charlie he holds him up, instead of breaking through the gards through Boon, and having them blame Boon, he found a way to just make them all useless.

I agree with all that has been put here, Charlie did the right thing. He also needed to break out from the patern of others not 'giving him a gun', he has proven to him self twice now that he is capable of following through on a promise.

Date: 2005-02-14 09:45 pm (UTC)
fyrdrakken: (Violent)
From: [personal profile] fyrdrakken
That is a truly beautiful thought, that the reason Sawyer was handed the gun was because he was the implicitly designated hatchet man, the one who could be trusted to shoot if he got a clear shot. (Though after the way he fucked up euthanizing the marshall -- and the crying jag he had afterwards, proving he felt really really bad about it -- could be he really would have frozen up.) I really need to rewatch that ep.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ishtar79.livejournal.com
Wait, people are actually *blaming* Charlie for what he did?

I can't condemn his actions, even though from an outsider's perspective, they do not appear thought-out, or indeed sane. Ethan nearly killed him, kidnapped Claire for God knows what, and oh yes, is an utter psycho. What was he supposed to do, turn him over to the proper authorities?

Yes, perhaps emptying the barrel of a gun into a man's chest isn't the most logical or civilised course of action, but I hardly think the whole 'taking the law into their hands and planning torture' thing the others had going would win them any brownie points with Amnesty International, you know? At least Charlie had solid reasons.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
I've seen more than one person already calling Charlie a moron for killing Ethan. Which ... yeah, whatever.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:18 pm (UTC)
ext_14712: (subtle machinations)
From: [identity profile] unanon.livejournal.com
Right before Charlie shot Ethan, my sister and I were both saying "but he's not going to tell them anything anyway..." Also, he would be a much greater threat to them had he managed to escape during 'interrogation.'

Although Crazy Island Bondage is never a bad thing.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceejayoz.livejournal.com
My only quibble is that, with 100 bullets on the entire island, he should've only shot once. ;-)

Date: 2005-02-12 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
Well, he was a little emotionally disturbed at the time. ;) (I still say that he could have realistically argued temporary insanity in the real world. Or at least, that I'd back him up on that defense.)

Date: 2005-02-12 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dorothywwom.livejournal.com
Actually, considering all the stuff that Ethan was ablt to do, I thik he might have reloaded.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceejayoz.livejournal.com
Heh. Knowing the island, we'll get Ethan 2.0 in the season finale.

Date: 2005-02-13 01:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] singeaddams.livejournal.com
Oh, my feelings exactly. The guy was just so physically strong, eerily competent and completely unemotional that I truly think he's some kind of clone or robot.

He's gonna come baaaaack and the question will be WHAT MAD SCIENTIST IS CONTROLLING THE ROBOT ETHANS?!!1!!

Date: 2005-02-14 09:46 pm (UTC)
fyrdrakken: (Dancing Hugh)
From: [personal profile] fyrdrakken
Can't recall -- how many times did he shoot? Because when making a body shot, I believe the conventional wisdom is to shoot at least twice.

Date: 2005-02-14 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
He shot about five times.

Date: 2005-02-14 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ceejayoz.livejournal.com
I think he shot five times, 'though I'd have to download Lost again to check. :-p

Date: 2005-02-14 10:57 pm (UTC)
fyrdrakken: (Dancing Hugh)
From: [personal profile] fyrdrakken
Yeah, I need to rewatch it myself. Thanks both of you for the answer. And hey, I've also been told that emptying a clip into someone is fine in cases of self-defense (especially if you're not that experienced a shootist or that great of a shot) -- it's only if you take the time to reload and pump some more rounds in that you start to get problems justifying it in court afterwards.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] overloved.livejournal.com
more importantly, if Charlie *hadn't* killed "Ethan", we would not have gotten to see Dom holding a gun.

And that's important.

Date: 2005-02-12 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apocalypsos.livejournal.com
Oh, yes. Some of us desperately need to see Dom hold a gun because it's hella sexy because we need to see him with a weapon for creative purposes. *innocent eyes*

Date: 2005-02-12 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuit-belle.livejournal.com
I think Charlie made the right decision. Obviously, if they'd been able to get information out of Ethan, that would have been good. But there's no guarentee that they would've. Ethan tried to Charlie, threatened again to kill him (while holding him by the throat, reminding poor Charlie of what happened earlier) and then no one expected Charlie to react, to protect himself and Claire?

(I've friended you; hope you don't mind.)

Date: 2005-02-12 08:14 pm (UTC)
ext_9141: (Default)
From: [identity profile] suaine.livejournal.com
Hmm. There are people blaming Charlie for what he did? See, that's what I get from keeping out of fandom except for the occasional episode review...

All your points are really good and should be etched on any Charlie haters eye-lids. Besides, these guys are just mad because they thought they were getting some info on the big mystery and now they didn't ;)

Date: 2005-02-12 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catystorm.livejournal.com
Gih, that news article you linked to has been all over the news over here. Since, you know, Fort Mitchell is like three towns over from where I live. >.>

Also, I can't believe people are calling Charlie a moron for that. He had more self-restraint than I would have in that situation. Empty the clip into Ethan, and then I'd probably go and kick the corpse several times for good measure. :P

Date: 2005-02-12 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] no-remorse.livejournal.com
The problem is that as cleolinda said that they couldn't imprison him permanently. And they could have set him free either. So sooner or later, they would have been faced with a dilemma with no human rights-friendly, safe solution. If Jack has already to condoned the torture of Sawyer over a bunch of inhalers and the mercy killing of the marshall, what treatment would he condoned for a kidnapper and murderer, who wouldn't hesitate to do either again? They would have probably arrived at the same conclusion, Charlie arrived at - that only a dead Ethan is a safe Ethan. Ethan would have been tortured for a bit and then someone would have shot him in cold blood. I think that would have been the worse scenario for everyone.

Date: 2005-02-12 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] denial-girl.livejournal.com
I cheered when Charlie shot Ethan (though I thought it would be Claire who did it). The other characters need to get off their high horses (why yes Jack, I am looking at you) because they weren't the ones Ethan hung up by the neck, mmmm'kay? ITA with everybody else here.

Date: 2005-02-14 09:52 pm (UTC)
fyrdrakken: (Vicious)
From: [personal profile] fyrdrakken
Claire can't recall what happened, or so she claims. (And I've gotta wonder when her memory "starts" again -- like, at what point during or after her escape and reunion with the other survivors -- and whether her convenient amnesia is as faked as Charlie's claim to remember nothing seems to be, or whether Ethan actually did something to the pair of them while he had them that really did temporarily wipe part of their recent memory -- and I say temporarily because Charlie apparently remembers a bit after all and Claire recalled the peanut butter.) Need to rewatch the ep to see if it's implied that she recognized Ethan when he showed up again -- but scratches on his face aside, she didn't remember enough about anyone on the island to know yet who to trust, let alone whether it was justifiable to haul off and kill someone.

Date: 2005-02-12 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ficangel.livejournal.com
Nope, I agree with you. As frustrating as it was to once again be left with no hints to the larger mystery, I don't see what else they could have done. Kept Ethan prisoner indefinitely? And what, put poor Claire in that kind of risk again, for someone who not only kills but goes out of his way to kill in the most painful way he can conceive of? Tortured Ethan for the info? That would have invalidated the 'torture is always wrong' path they were going down by the end of 'Confidence Man' with one of 'torture is only wrong if it's one of your people' and that's...scariness, not to mention unlikely to yield answers anyway. I think Charlie's grip on the sanity rope slipped a little with the rage in which he did it, but I don't think they were out of line in putting down a rabid dog.

I like the "sheep in wolf's clothing" theory put out my WM and think it would be the best plot twist in the universe if it came out to be true, but ultimately I'm not going to hold my breath. Even if the writers retconned it so that Scott was somehow infected, the manner in which Ethan killed him ruins it for me.

Date: 2005-02-13 01:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] muffytaj.livejournal.com
I would have killed Ethan in cold blood. Logic > little moral spits from people who are in no position to have little moral spits kthxJACK.

Although I probably would have done a quick torture, i.e:

Me: Tell us everything.
Ethan: No.
Me: *shoots him in crotch/leg* Tell us everything.
Ethan: BWAHAHAHA CRAZY MAN ME! I EAT YOUR FACE!
Me: *shrugs* Okay. *shoots him in head*

Just to make a point :p

Date: 2005-02-13 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tenebris.livejournal.com
I have seen people saying, "Damn, stupid ending, they're not gonna answer any questions!" blah blah blah. Which, given my experience with Chris Carter, I am a little worried about. But the non-meta point is that, well, Charlie did something smart. (He broke a man's arms and neck and other bones without the man screaming! AAAAH!) And it made total sense that it was him. Dude, does anyone remember that Charlie was traumatized, too? (And that he also doesn't remember anything from his experience with Ethan? I know, hanged, but still...I'd be looking for connections, here. The way they set that hanging up was suspicious.)

If WM's theory about Ethan is right, well, while I like it, that'd be a helluva retcon. And I do think we'll see more of Ethan or Ethan types before this ends; too good to pass up!

Date: 2005-02-13 02:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tenebris.livejournal.com
ETHAN broke a man's arms and neck and other bones without the man screaming. Damn pronoun concordance!

Date: 2005-02-13 05:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lots42.livejournal.com
It's obvious Ethan killed Scott before breaking the other bones. Ethan is sick.

Date: 2005-02-13 05:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lots42.livejournal.com
And besides, Ethan is physically dangerous. He took down Charlie and Claire, he somehow hung Charlie, he beat the living snot out of Jack and evaded at least one trained and experienced tracker.

Captured Ethan would spent twenty-four straight hours straining at his bonds and then snap the neck of the first one or five people he sees.

Date: 2005-02-13 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theshapeshifter.livejournal.com
THANK YOU. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks that Charlie's actions - while not necessarily thought-out - were the only option. How would they restrain a man who can lift another grown man off the ground by the neck with one hand? And I absolutely think that the only info they would've gotten out of Ethan would be dangerous misinformation, sending them into harm's way.

Here via [livejournal.com profile] lost_news, btw.

Date: 2005-02-14 09:56 pm (UTC)
fyrdrakken: (Snarky)
From: [personal profile] fyrdrakken
See, I just don't hang out on enough Lost message boards, because until you said something it didn't really occur to me that there was much room for argument that when one weighed the odds of Ethan escaping to wreak further havok against the odds of getting useful information out of him that Charlie had totally done the prudent thing. Vengeance, hell -- that man needed killin'. And the only complaints my friends had about Charlie's behavior was in the flashback -- specifically, A) telling whatsherface he wanted to take care of her and B) stealing Churchill's cigarette case which would probably be a bitch to fence and perhaps quite traceable besides.

Profile

apocalypsos: (Default)
tatty bojangles

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags