So I wandered over to The Book Spoiler and read the spoiler for LKH's Incubus Dreams.
...
...
...
Oh, for fuck's sake.
*headsmack*
EDIT: I'm listening to a retro Internet radio, and "The Girl is Mine" by Michael Jackson and Paul McCartney just played. Listening to those two lyrically fight over a girl is my new nightmare.
Also, now it's "When You Get Caught Between the Moon and New York City". Hmph. I need to buy Arthur on DVD. And also, to change the radio station.
...
...
...
Oh, for fuck's sake.
*headsmack*
EDIT: I'm listening to a retro Internet radio, and "The Girl is Mine" by Michael Jackson and Paul McCartney just played. Listening to those two lyrically fight over a girl is my new nightmare.
Also, now it's "When You Get Caught Between the Moon and New York City". Hmph. I need to buy Arthur on DVD. And also, to change the radio station.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:03 am (UTC)I'm fine with all the sex in the Merry Gentry series because the character started out that way. With Anita? It feels like she's betrayed the character and the person we knew Anita to be. That, plus the idea that Micah(?) is actually based on her husband (Mary Sue! Mary Sue!) makes me want to fling the books far, far away.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:10 am (UTC)It was when yet again, just like in every other book, Anita spent fifty pages or so dithering over whether to pick Jean-Claude or Richard and "Oh, woe is me! Two hot guys want to fuck me! *swoons*", and then she'd get injured and/or have to show off her scars, and in every single book, she always made a crack about, "Well, I'm going to die by the time I'm thirty." Well, if you're going to die by the time you're thirty, then why the hell do you keep whining about your sex life? Nail 'em both! Have an orgy! Who gives a shit?
*grrrr* Man, she's annoying. (And before anybody asks, "Anita or Laurell?", the appropriate answer is, of course, "Since when are they two different people?")
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:13 am (UTC)Anyway, we were poking around the SF/F book section and I spotted Incubus Dreams, flipped it open at random, read the first sentence I saw, and promptly laughed so hard I was nearly sick all over the nice B&N carpet, probably causing worry to the rest of the WriMos watching me. (The sentence in question involved the phrase, or something near like it, "You're the one who just sprayed all over me!" As someone put it: this is the book where LKH discovered female ejaculation.)
Thus was promptly born a game: take two or three books, one of which must always be a LKH, Incubus Dreams by preference, flip it open at random, and read aloud the first sentence you come to. It worked particularly well with the LKH, Lovecraft, and Stephen R Donaldson combo, for some reason.
We laughed ourselves sick both times, and both times we stopped playing when a sentence was hit that was so bad that the reader couldn't manage it without laughing hysterically and had to pass the book to someone else.
The first night?
"Fuck me, fuck me, fuck me, please, fuck me, fuck me, fuck me." (Approximately. It may have sprouted a few extra 'fuck me's in the telling, memory being fickle and all.)
The second afternoon?
"Fuck me, Jean-Claude, fuck me while I'm still tight!"
After all that I felt a lot better about Incubus Dreams.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:14 am (UTC)Memorexbad amateur pr0n?"*twitches madly*
Way back when... I liked those books. I stopped reading them about... four or five books ago and just never looked back.
Mary SueAnita Blake is just too damn annoying for words.no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:20 am (UTC)*is dead* I may have had the exact same reaction, frighteningly enough.
Maybe she's trying to write a satire and we're not just getting the joke. *scratches head*
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:22 am (UTC)It's sad, though, because I got hooked on Anita Blake two years ago (having already read one of the Merry Gentry ones and been... confused, but a little intrigued, by it). The second book was the first one I read, and I loved it-- my favorite part was where the zombie came in through the window, and when she killed it she got zombie guts all over her penguin collection. She had quirks, she kicked ass, she lived alone. Things were better then. *nostalgic sigh*
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:26 am (UTC)She's certainly in touch with her inner pervert. (And also touched in the head.)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:28 am (UTC)Say whatwho? Please 'splain. Before my little head explodes.
-blue
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:30 am (UTC)*sighs* And she has so much talent, too, if only her editors dared to call her on her excesses any longer. The last LKH book I can remember reading and liking was...Cerulean Sins? The big Edward-centric book before it all just went to hell.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:31 am (UTC)*snerk* I only realized that after I posted it. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:42 am (UTC)Glad I'm not the only one who noticed that all of a sudden the books went from good to pwp- only her books are more just porn, and quite frankly I think I could write better smut than her and maybe I even have in my rpgs. lol
Cerulean Sins I was hoping would be better than the previous one, and I read it and read it and read it, getting more and more disgusted with each sex-filled chapter, wondering where the damn plot would pop up. Except, it never did. Or maybe got mentioned on like one page in a single sentence. I was like, WTF? If I want porn, I'll read lj! :P
Bah!
But, there was one line I did like- something about 'accidental sex as if she'd tripped and fallen only to land on an errection'.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:54 am (UTC)