Conversations with my brother
May. 15th, 2007 06:16 pmMe: "Let ask you a question."
Bryan: "Okay."
Me: "I'm not going to pretend you don't watch porn, right?"
Bryan: "Oh, yeah, I watch porn all the time."
Me: "And you've watched lesbian porn, yeah?"
Bryan: "Sure."
Me: "So if those two girls were sisters, would that gross you out at all?"
Bryan: "No, not really."
Me: "But it's gross if it's a woman thinking it's hot watching two brothers making out?"
Bryan: "Well, yeah."
Me: "So two brothers making out is gross, but two sisters making out is perfectly okay?"
Bryan: "Oh, sure, that's fine."
It was the casual way he threw out that last line that made me giggle for five minutes straight.
Bryan: "Okay."
Me: "I'm not going to pretend you don't watch porn, right?"
Bryan: "Oh, yeah, I watch porn all the time."
Me: "And you've watched lesbian porn, yeah?"
Bryan: "Sure."
Me: "So if those two girls were sisters, would that gross you out at all?"
Bryan: "No, not really."
Me: "But it's gross if it's a woman thinking it's hot watching two brothers making out?"
Bryan: "Well, yeah."
Me: "So two brothers making out is gross, but two sisters making out is perfectly okay?"
Bryan: "Oh, sure, that's fine."
It was the casual way he threw out that last line that made me giggle for five minutes straight.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:24 pm (UTC)Oh, boys. ♥
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:24 pm (UTC)I'm sure that's the double standard in action somehow, but my brain to too melted to work it out.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:55 pm (UTC)It may be based on goals.
Date: 2007-05-16 12:30 am (UTC)Re: It may be based on goals.
Date: 2007-05-16 08:45 pm (UTC)Also, in the conversation reported above here, there are two slightly different situations: 1. Girls kissing which is hot, who turn out to be sisters, which doesn't reduce teh hotness, and 2. Boys kissing which is hot *because* they're brothers. So because vs. in spite of.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 10:50 pm (UTC)Well, god knows no one would ever find brothers making out hot.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 11:01 pm (UTC)Incest just rubs me the wrong way. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 07:10 am (UTC)Think about how Wincest or Petrellicest is thought of in a wider audience or the Olsen (OMG ALMOST LEGAL!1!) Twins. It was OK to want to fantasise about the girls (but only after they were old enough, WTF) because their actual relationship is irrelevant. The Winchester or Petrelli brothers are seen as brothers first not cardboard-standee-sexy-sexin'-twins.
I probably made no sense there sorry. =)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-15 11:42 pm (UTC)Well, maybe not a moral - maybe more of a handy guide.
*la*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 12:31 am (UTC)You should have seen this boy's reaction to a Petrellicest comm I was looking at...
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 11:45 am (UTC)Has anyone actually written a foursome involving the Winchesters and lesbian twins?
I'm just casually asking that for, um, no reason, purely scientific curiousity, um, yeah.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 03:24 am (UTC)I have read fic that features the Winchesters and lesbian twins, but the guys were the girls fathers. And there was no cross gen in it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-16 05:42 pm (UTC)I'm much more ok with fictional characters committing incest than I am actual people doing it. I've read books and seen movies with with incest depicted (almost any book by Heinlein is loaded with incest) and it never really bothered me; but it's not something I want my neighbors doing with the curtains open.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-24 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 06:09 am (UTC)