From Ask Ausiello ...
Aug. 13th, 2008 01:41 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The italics are mine.
Question: As much as the female fans of Supernatural seem to hate the idea, I think that Bella and Ruby added a nice dynamic last season. Will the show's writers ever stand up to the fans and give at least one of the brothers and ongoing love interest? -- Jeff
Ausiello: Not if they value their life. And based on Eric Kripke's response to this question, I'm guessing they do. "The most dangerous job in Hollywood is to be the recurring female lead on Supernatural," Kripke laughs. "No, the formula in terms of romance that really has proven to work best for us is a girl in every port. Not that there’s not ongoing characters. But there are going to be recurring female characters threaded in and out of the story, and they will affect the storylines. But just to have them in sort of passive love interest roles is something that hasn’t really worked."
Oh, faaaaaabulous. I'm part of THAT fandom.
*headdesk*
(Not that I didn't know, but ... you know, past Kripke's lips, it sounds even worse.)
Question: As much as the female fans of Supernatural seem to hate the idea, I think that Bella and Ruby added a nice dynamic last season. Will the show's writers ever stand up to the fans and give at least one of the brothers and ongoing love interest? -- Jeff
Ausiello: Not if they value their life. And based on Eric Kripke's response to this question, I'm guessing they do. "The most dangerous job in Hollywood is to be the recurring female lead on Supernatural," Kripke laughs. "No, the formula in terms of romance that really has proven to work best for us is a girl in every port. Not that there’s not ongoing characters. But there are going to be recurring female characters threaded in and out of the story, and they will affect the storylines. But just to have them in sort of passive love interest roles is something that hasn’t really worked."
Oh, faaaaaabulous. I'm part of THAT fandom.
*headdesk*
(Not that I didn't know, but ... you know, past Kripke's lips, it sounds even worse.)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-14 02:08 am (UTC)