OMG YOU GUYS WTF IS WRONG WITH SPLICE.
NO, TRUST ME, YOU WANT TO BE SPOILED. NO, I CAN'T TAKE THE CAPS LOCK OFF. DUDE, WHAT THE SAUCY UNDILUTED HELL?!
EDIT: Oh, and that link is triggery like WHOA.
NO, TRUST ME, YOU WANT TO BE SPOILED. NO, I CAN'T TAKE THE CAPS LOCK OFF. DUDE, WHAT THE SAUCY UNDILUTED HELL?!
EDIT: Oh, and that link is triggery like WHOA.
What do you think causes the reaction?
Date: 2010-06-06 05:54 pm (UTC)While I won't judge the film on it's merits, I do think it is triggering, and does not warn specifically about what happens.
Re: What do you think causes the reaction?
Date: 2010-06-06 06:02 pm (UTC)The studios are not marketing it as honestly as they could (probably because they'd lose their money if they marketed it for what it actually is). It took ten years for this movie to finally get funded and made, so Vin's not going to jump up and go "no, no, you're doing it wrong because this is actually about ___."
However, the marketing department or someone needs to make mention of his formerly directed/written movies because it is in that vein and I feel deeply sorry for anyone that goes blindly into this movie having no clue who Vin is (or Guillermo del Toro, because he's one of the producers).
Splice is not for everyone. It's not for a majority of the usual movie-going audience. But if you're a fan of Vin's works and you're aware that this goes further than anything he's ever done, then maybe you can handle it. Still, it's going to be hard.
Re: What do you think causes the reaction?
Date: 2010-06-06 11:27 pm (UTC)IT'S A MOTHERFUCKING HORROR MOVIE.
Agreed, but
Date: 2010-06-06 11:31 pm (UTC)There is Bram Stoker's Dracula or Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and then there is Saw or Last House on the Left.
There is a difference, in my opinion, between "conceptional" horror, and the acts which take place within this movie. I don't judge it, as I am not the target audience. As such, I claim the right to not wish to see it.
Re: Agreed, but
Date: 2010-06-07 12:09 am (UTC)The bioethics was fine
Date: 2010-06-07 12:13 am (UTC)Re: The bioethics was fine
Date: 2010-06-07 12:19 am (UTC)Re: Agreed, but
Date: 2010-06-07 12:20 am (UTC)Rated R for disturbing elements including strong sexuality, nudity, sci-fi violence and language.
The MPAA also has warnings for rape and sexual violence, but neither were added to that listing. "Strong sexuality" is not the same thing to describe what's going on in the movie.
Re: Agreed, but
Date: 2010-06-10 06:46 am (UTC)Maybe someone thought that's what sci-fi violence meant.
*headdesks*
Re: What do you think causes the reaction?
Date: 2010-06-07 03:09 am (UTC)Horror is huge. HUGE. You could be a U.S. horror fan and go your whole life never seeing anything disturbing in this kind of rape-incest way and not even really KNOWING about this type of horror film.
Re: What do you think causes the reaction?
Date: 2010-06-07 04:19 am (UTC)So, yeah.
It's all fun and games until it takes seventeen billion panels to put someone's eye out.