(no subject)
May. 12th, 2004 11:40 amWhen I walked in the door at work, Lieutenant Asshat and Bossman asked me where to find the video of the beheading on the Internet, then laughed hysterically when I immediately blurted out three websites to find it on.
Great. I know where all the good gore is. What a lovely reputation to have. *eye roll*
Great. I know where all the good gore is. What a lovely reputation to have. *eye roll*
Re: Better that than...
Date: 2004-05-12 05:08 pm (UTC)You say, "if the interest is not too voyeuristic, then I do not see sharing the information as objectionable." How many went to those sites out of anything but a morbid desire to see someone "really" die. Too many people don't want to watch that video to learn and to know what true hatred and pain and horrific suffering is. They look at it like it's something from a movie or television show -- just more graphic than usual. How many of them understood what they saw?
Jen's post really bothers me because my thought processes work more along the lines of: if that were my father, my uncle, my brother, my son -- would I want links to his slaughter passed back and forth over the internet like so many game demos? Would I want the comments of, "All I have to say is just ... ugh. And I have a strong stomach when it comes to mind, so the act itself isn't what disgusts me." It doesn't? What the heck does disgust you? Only the politics? THAT'S what I'm appalled and disappointed by.
Yes, Jen's co-workers definitely needed that bitchslap warning. Now if only Jen would think about what she posts, then maybe I won't feel like she needs one too.
Teri
Re: Better that than...
Date: 2004-05-12 05:36 pm (UTC)That's not it at all. It's not the act ALONE that bothered me. It was everything about it. Perhaps I should have phrased it better, but that's what I meant.
Re: Better that than...
Date: 2004-05-12 07:06 pm (UTC)I disagree. Strongly. I think she is a good person dealing with horror the best way she knows how. I think she is a wonderful person, who is trying not to cry.
Jen's post really bothers me because my thought processes work more along the lines of: if that were my father, my uncle, my brother, my son -- would I want links to his slaughter passed back and forth over the internet like so many game demos?
She has often posted what poor examples of humanity she deals with. She gave them the information they asked for without judging. She was brave enough to give them the information, to hope that they would be human. They failed. Her intent in laudable.
Now if only Jen would think about what she posts, then maybe I won't feel like she needs one too.
I disagree. I think she posted this hoping someone who help her not feel so bad about this. You are basing your opinions of her post based on your worst case scenarios of what the worst of humanity feels. If you think so little of her, why allow her to live under your roof.
Re: Better that than...
Date: 2004-05-12 07:29 pm (UTC)And, to answer your last paragraph -- I wouldn't be much of a friend, would I, if I turned her out because I disagree with something that she's done. I also wouldn't be much of a friend if I only ever agreed with her. I'm a lot older than Jen and I have certain views on how I perceive life. Jen knew them before she moved in, they haven't changed in the year she's lived with us - they're not now or have never been anything new or shocking to her. Jen has always been like a younger sister to me, and if you can't tell a younger sister that you think what she's done is wrong, then obviously the connection isn't what you thought it was.
And with that I will let the subject drop, because it's obvious that I'm the only person replying to this thread that feels the way I do.
Re: Better that than...
Date: 2004-05-12 08:48 pm (UTC)